After finishing Heaven's Net is Wide, I couldn't wait to get started on the next book in the series. I was in for a bit of a shock, however. While Heaven's Net left me with a warm fuzzy feeling of hope and a foreshadowing of vindication and justice delivered, Nightingale left me absolutely furious with a bad taste in my mouth. Most of my rage came from betrayal that 80% of the promised justice and vindication never showed up, and the bad taste came from the 20% that did. Don't get me wrong, Nightingale is still a good book. (the fact that I became so emotionally involved is a testament to the author's skill) I'll finish the series eventually, but my enthusiasm is significantly dimmed.
Another difference between the two is that unlike the first book, which is told in third person from various points of view, this one is alternately in first person and third person. The main character Takeo is the only one who has the privilege of narrating for himself, anyone else whose viewpoint is required for the story has to make do with third person. It's an unusual structure, but it works.
Note: For an intro to this series, read the first half of my Heaven's Net is Wide review
Overview
The book opens with a description of Tomasu's childhood in the village of the Hidden (a Christian sect). It's an idyllic life, although the young Tomasu is slightly restless, with the age old 'I'm-bigger-than-this-town' syndrome. As we find out later, Tomasu’s case is justified—he is descended from a secretive race known only as the Tribe, who possess semi-magical powers. This is quickly and brutally cured when the evil warlord Iida Sadamu, who has a particular vendetta against the Hidden, shows up and murders everyone he can get his hands on. Fortunately, he can't get his hands on Tomasu, who flees the villiage with soldiers close on his heels. This is the point where the first book ended, and the fleeing boy meets Otori Shigeru, who saves him from the soldiers, takes him under his wing, and renames him ‘Takeo’ to hide his Hidden origins. The story continues with Takeo’s adoption into the Otori clan, the development of his Tribe skills, and his training in the arts of the warrior and the assassin. (or samurai and ninja, if you prefer the Japanese names, although they are very pointedly avoided in the book) As time goes on, Takeo realizes that his encounter with Shigeru was no accident, and that he had specifically been chosen and trained to be the assassin of Iida Sadamu: the most evil, powerful, and paranoid man in the Three Countries.
Recommended for: Anyone who’s read the first book, or fans of fantasy and anime
Parental worries: Not for the kiddies: sex, violence, attempted rape, all that jazz. (and some hints at bisexuality, if that bugs you)
Audiobook Comments: Read by Kevin Gray and Aiko Nakasone, not the same readers as Heaven’s Net, but still the same format: male narrator for male POV and vice versa. The names of people and places are also pronounced slightly different for these two readers, with more accurate Japanese accents.
Ramblings (Spoiler Threat: Low)
I'm trying to decide whether my decision to read the prequel before the original was a good one, and I'm leaning toward yes, because there is so much in Nightingale that would have really come out of left field without the backstory from Heaven's Net. I guess I lost the joy of discovering the world of the Otori at the same time as Takeo, but it was as much fun (if not more) to watch him discover what was already familiar to me. Also, Shigeru is a very enigmatic character in Nightingale; I probably would have become completely fed up and slightly disgusted with him if I hadn't known his history. (i.e, why he was willing to adopt a stranger for the express purpose of training him as an assassin--shaping and forging the boy as a weapon against some random bad guy) I’ve also thumbed through some of the Amazon reviews for Nightingale, and it sounds like the lack of explanation ranks pretty high as a complaint among the bad reviews.
On the other hand, reading the prequel first meant that my focus was off--since the first book involved Shigeru suffering horrific tragedy and insult at the hands of Sadamu and his uncles, all I really wanted was to see was Shigeru claim his revenge against them all and take his place as the rightful ruler of the Otori. That's what I felt was promised throughout the first book and most of the second. That is not at all what happened. While the ensuing disappointment would only be enough to whet the interest and compassion of someone not acquainted with Heaven's Net, to me it was a complete and utter failure of the whole affair. Never mind that in the wider scheme of things, Takeo is the center and Shigeru's tragedy is only meant to give Takeo's life direction, to spur him on to a greater destiny. I think that’s a failure in the story arrangement: if you haven’t read the (admittedly very good) backstory, then you don’t understand enough, but if you have read the backstory you get hung out to dry.
The second largest problem I have with this series so far is that Hearn simply cannot write romance. When she tries, the result is either creepy (for the pairings that aren’t your ‘made in heaven, lasting for all eternity’ variety) or painfully clichéd and overdone (the love at first sight, ‘we must have been lovers in other lives’ variety). I can understand that the plot doesn’t leave too much room for romance, but there’s got to be a better way of fitting it in.
Extra Rant (Spoiler threat: Very High)
That's right, this rant gets a section all to itself (for easy skipping, ‘cause it probably won’t make sense unless you’ve actually read the book):
Screw Muto Kenji and the horse he rode in on! It's not enough that the Tribe killed Takeo's real father, Kenji had to be the star player in the death of Takeo's adopted father as well. I cannot remember the last time I was this pissed off at a character, and it's kind of sad that I can get so angry at someone who doesn't exist. It's not that he's an evil character, that's the problem. If he was a traditionally evil character, with no knowledge or care of right and wrong, then his betrayal would be more understandable. But Kenji has a fair amount of good in him--we can see it in his affection for Shigeru, Takeo and various members of his family. The problem is that he's so dedicated to his #$%@#! Tribe that he's willing to throw away every last one of them for its benefit. Not a noble sacrifice, bravely endured for the greater good, but the betrayal of trust and friendship simply because the Tribe wanted to keep a monster in power (more money for them). And then he has the gall, the gall to ask Shigeru for forgiveness. Shigeru, who had been stripped of his rank, labeled a traitor and crucified on the castle walls. And the thing is, Shigeru might have given it to him, if not for the fact that Kenji's betrayal had also resulted in the death of Lady Maruyama and her unborn child. It doesn't really matter that it was Sadamu's hand behind all the killings, at that point Sadamu had become a force of nature—doing the most harm, the most evil, wherever he could. And Kenji knowingly unleashed that force onto the only man he had ever considered a friend. I can think of no fate horrible enough for such a man.
Labels: fantasy, Tales of the Otori
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment